Sunday, 6 March 2011

Saudi Arabia: More protests and 'Day of Rage' called for 11th March

By Rukhsana Manzoor and Khalid Bhatti, SMP (CWI in Pakistan)
http://www.socialistworld.net/doc/4898

Below we publish extracts from two articles on the situation in Saudi Arabia, which could be standing on the verge of a new protest movement inspired by the revolutionary events underway in North Africa and the Middle East. The threat of the spreading of this phenomenon to Saudi Arabia fills the capitalists and imperialists of the region and the world (in the US in particular) with a well justified fear. A mass movement of Saudi workers and poor against the country’s repressive dictatorial monarchy and ruling elite for democratic rights and a solution to the country’s social crisis, with mass unemployment and poverty, would shake capitalism and imperialism. More news and analysis to follow.


The strong winds of change that are blowing throughout the Middle East have finally come to the Saudi Arabia. In last few weeks, some small demonstrations have taken place in different cities. Although, these demonstrations were small but none the less are beginning of an important development in this key Gulf country. It might take more time before the eruption of a mass movement of unemployed youth, layers of public sector workers and middle class people including doctors, engineers, lawyers and professors. It is just the beginning of a long process but an important one.


In many ways, Saudi Arabia has by far the most serious problems of all the Gulf States - a large, youthful and sometimes restive population, chafing under the rule of an aging leadership. There is mass unemployment and corruption, no political rights and few personal freedoms. There has even been unrest in areas such as Najran and the oil-rich Eastern Province, where the minority Shia population is concentrated.
A Saudi "Day of Rage" has been called for 11 March. Just weeks ago, analysts would have said there was no chance of protests, but now there does seem to be the potential for scenes of protest and violence.
Saudi Arabia, a top oil exporter and close U.S. ally is an absolute monarchy that does not tolerate any form of public dissent, does not have an elected parliament or any political parties.
In the town of Safwa, in the eastern region of the kingdom, a march of dozens of Saudis was held. They demanded the release of political prisoners detained without trial since 1996 on suspicion of involvement in the bombing of U.S. barracks in Khobar.
The march urged Saudi authorities to release the nine prisoners. In the city of Qatif, a protest march was held. It was the second of its kind in less than 24 hours, involving about 200 youths. The participants chanted slogans "No Sunni-Shiite .. We all call for freedom."
About 60 women staged a rare demonstration in the Saudi capital Riyadh on Saturday, demanding the release of prisoners held without trial as part of efforts to fight Al Qaeda insurgents, activists said.
Saudi legal authorities released 52 women yesterday who were arrested after protesting in front of the Interior Ministry, reports the Al Quds Al Arabi daily newspaper. The women were released after a meeting between Prince Naif ben Abdelaziz, the Interior Minister, and the relatives of the detainees, who had to promise not to repeat their actions. Amnesty International and other human rights activists have accused Saudi Arabia of having detained thousands of reform activists in its sweep against Al Qaeda, which staged a campaign inside the kingdom from 2003-06.
Nearly 300 people protested in Port city Jeddah against the local authorities for providing poor services. This protest came after the worst flooding in the city in which many buildings, houses and shops were inundated in floodwaters which caused widespread destruction. The police attacked the protest and arrested many people.
Saudi Shi’ites have held a small protest in the kingdom’s oil-producing eastern province, close to Gulf Arab neighbor Bahrain, where unrest has cost six lives, local Shi’ite sources said on Saturday.
They said a group of Shi’ites staged a protest on Thursday in the town of Awwamiya, near the Saudi Shi’ite center of Qatif on the Gulf coast, to demand the release of fellow Shi’ites held in prison without trial. Saudi authorities on Sunday released three Shiite detainees who spent more than a year in jail without trial because of their involvement in a popular sit-in in Qatif province in 2009.
The Saudi Arabian regime fears the possible effects of the bloody protests against the royal family in neighboring Bahrain. It fears that unrest in Bahrain, where majority Shi’ites are protesting against the Sunni government, might spread to its Shi’ite minority who mostly live in the eastern province, the source of Saudi oil wealth.
Saudi Arabia applies an austere Wahhabi version of Sunni Islam and minority Shi’ites say that, while their situation has improved under reforms launched by King Abdullah, they still face restrictions in landing senior government jobs.
Awwamiya, a town visibly less affluent than the rest of the country, was the scene of protests for weeks in 2009 after police launched a search for firebrand Shi’ite preacher, Nimr al-Nimr, who breached a taboo, suggesting in a sermon that Shi’ites could one day seek their own separate state.
The threat, which analysts say was unprecedented since the 1979 Irarian revolution provoked anti-Saudi protests, followed clashes between the Sunni religious police and Shi’ite pilgrims near the tomb of Prophet Mohammad in the holy city of Medina. Since then Saudi Shi’ites say the situation has calmed down but they are still waiting for many promised reform to be carried out. Officials say Shi’ites make up 10% of the Saudi population, though some put it closer to 15%.

Founders of new political party arrested
Saudi authorities have also detained several activists who tried to set up the kingdom’s first political party, human rights activists said on Saturday.
Saudi Islamists and opposition activists this month launched a political party called the "Islamic Umma" in a rare challenge to authority, inspired by mass struggles triggering regime change in Tunisia and Egypt.
This party seems to be dominated by moderate Islamists, who oppose both the religious clergy and al-Qaeda ideology and call for the reforms in the country. At this stage, only existing activists are members of this party and some of them have been campaigning for several years for greater political freedom in Saudi Arabia. These activists are well known in Saudi Arabia and widely respected for their struggle.
"Saudi suppression of political activity is as swift as it is total," Christoph Wilcke, senior Middle East researcher at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.
"At a time when people throughout the Arab world are out on the street seeking greater freedom, the Saudi secret police seem determined to nip any similar demands in the bud."
The new party had called on its website for the holding of elections, more transparency of government decisions and an independent judiciary.
There have been previous attempts to form parties but the group was the first to announce it publicly, analysts said. Its members include Islamist intellectuals, lecturers, human rights activists and lawyers.
More than 70 Saudi academics, headed by Sheikh Dr. Nasser al-Omar, have forwarded a letter to Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, demanding reforms, including the firing of "opportunists" and corrupt officials, putting an end to public money wasting and placing government contracts and transactions under public supervision.
The letter also demands that the regime "take urgent action to mitigate the effects of unemployment among young people." The signatories also called in their statement for " adequate support to individuals and families living below the poverty line." In addition, they advocated in their statement to open the doors to free print media, radio and television. The statement also called for the Shiite minority to be treated in a fair way.
Another group of some 120 Saudi academics, activists and businessmen have called for major reforms including the establishment of a "constitutional monarchy" in the kingdom, in a statement posted on the Internet on Sunday. "We will submit these requests to King Abdullah at a later stage," said Khaled al-Dakhil, a political science professor at the King Saud University.
The petition posted on the Internet calls for the election rather than appointment of a Shura consultative council, and the creation of a constitutional monarchy. It also calls for expanded participation of women in social and political life in the kingdom.
In a sign of rising discontent, a group of Saudi web activists also launched an online campaign calling for political reform. The Saudi campaign, which was launched on Facebook on 29 January and has 364 members so far, called for a constitutional monarchy, an end to corruption, an even distribution of wealth, and a serious solution to unemployment, among other demands. It claims to fight for "Those who are unemployed, who demand better work conditions and better civil rights."
Activists in Egypt have used the social media websites to rally supporters online and coordinate protests. Saudi Arabia does not allow public dissent. Last month, police detained dozens in the port city of Jeddah after they protested against poor infrastructure following deadly floods.
Among other demands, the Facebook page calls for:
  • Automobile factories to be opened in every major area and industrial training for young people.
  • Open factories in every area and provide better training in the world of technology, programming and maintenance
  • An increase in minimum wage to 6,000 Rials (1700 US dollars) and more employment for young people.
  • Open more schools
  • Eection of the Shura Council
  • An independent judiciary
  • An electoral district governor of the people
The Facebook page also notes that there are unemployed people in every home in Saudi Arabia and 76% of the population does not have affordable housing.
These demands clearly show the level of the consciousness of the activists and especially of young educated people. At this stage, the demands are of the democratic nature and more focused on reforms within the system. But as the movement will spread and masses will come into action than more radical demands will come out.
The CWI supports the fight for democratic rights, linked to a struggle to break the power of the national and international capitalists and imperialists, whose exploitation and domination of Saudi Arabia and the Middle East forms the basis for the political repression and economic misery which the people face. Only on the basis of democratic ownership and control of the country and region’s rich resources and wealth by workers and the poor in a socialist society can a viable solution be found.
It is just the beginning and there is potential for a broader movement of the youth and political activists to develop in coming days. Such a movement, with the Saudi working class and poor at its head, would rock the country’s rotten regime and capitalism and imperialism throughout the region.

Brstol & District Anti-Cuts Alliance Bulletin 6 March 2011

Circulated by BADACA:


This week's events

Monday 7 March - BADACA Open Meeting, 7.00pm, Broadmead Baptist Church, Union St.

Wednesday 9 March - BADACA Youth Group meeting - 7.00pm,  Bristol County Sports Club, Colston St.

Friday 11 March - DEBATE - ARE THE CUTS NECESSARY?    -    Huw Williams, BADACA v. Charlotte Leslie, Conservative MP for Bristol North West.
                                 7.30pm, Horfield United Reformed Church, Muller Road.
Communications
News and information on the cuts, anti-cuts activities and on BADACA can be found at:

Our website has a forum for supporters to post news items - either links to items in the media or information that they have. Please use it if you have any information or have come across interesting news items or links.

Our Facebook page has gained 100 new 'likes' in the past week and the Twitter feed, 107 followers.

Leafleting
UH Bristol are holding meetings to inform staff of their financial plans. It would be fantastic if we got some people outside giving out leaflets. Can any body help out? Here are the details of these meetings:

Monday 7 March: 2pm-3.30pm, Lecture Theatre, St Michael's Hospital
Wednesday 9 March: 9am-10.30am, Conference Room, Trust HQ, Marlborough St.

Please reply to this e-mail if you are able to help.
NHS Under Threat
An excellent pamphlet has been produced by members of BADACA's Health Group. It explains very clearly the threat to the NHS and how the health service in Bristol will be affected. It is being finalised and when it is ready, we would like supporters to distribute it as widely as possible. Printing costs have been covered by a very generous doanation from the Unison Branch at UWE. The health service will be the main topic for discussion at the Open Meeting.
Thanks to . . .
Mike Wheeler for organising Saturday's BADACA Social. It was a great success and raised over £200.
Pete McGann or organising the Sponsored Walk which will have raised a couple of hundred more when everyone who has promised sponsorship coughs up.
And don't forget . . .
March for the Alternative - TUC demonstration against the cuts, London, March 26th.

Coaches from Bristol - details: http://falseeconomy.org.uk/travel/south-west/BS/t1

THE COACHES ARE FILLING UP - BOOK YOUR SEAT NOW.

http://www.stuffit.org/cutz/baa4dif.jpg

Thursday, 3 March 2011

Bedminster Against the Cuts report


There were about 25 people at the Bedminster Against the Cuts meeting about half of which haven’t been involved in the Anti-Cuts Alliance before. The meeting mainly discussed how the cuts would affect ordinary people in South Bristol. We also talked about some of the things we could do locally to to help fight the cuts which are mentioned later on. We had two speakers, Bob who works for Bristol City Council and Frankie who works for the NHS, both are Unison activists.
Bob highlighted some of the budget cuts that the council had voted on last week and what this would mean. This includes up to 1000 jobs lost over the next 4 years, cuts for services like Connexions, a careers service for young people, cuts to public transport and road maintainence, cuts for social care for the elderly and disabled, and many more.
Frankie spoke about how the government’s plans for the health service effectively mean that all that will remain of the NHS is the name. The proposals will lead to its privatisation which will mean profit is put before patient care which will suffer as a result. One part of the plans is to allow hospitals to make as much money as they want from private, paying patients which means that these people will be able to jump the queue and the rest of us will be left with a second rate service.
Most people in the meeting contributed to the discussion and there was wide agreement that the cuts are unnecessary and ordinary people shouldn’t have to pay the price for a crisis we didn’t cause. Some alternatives to cutting were outlined including collecting the £120billion in tax that is avoided each year, mainly by the super rich; getting money back off the bankers and taking back into public ownership the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts that are bleeding billions of taxpayers money, amongst others.
We also discussed how to fight the cuts. The main upcoming event is the TUC organised national demonstration which is in London on Sat 26th March.
We arranged some leafletting for this Saturday (5th) in order to build publicity for the demonstration. We are meeting up at 11am outside Cannon St post office in Bedminster, please let me know if you are able to make it.
Other things that were mentioned as ways of getting involved were to write letters to the local press, or call in to radio stations and argue that cuts weren’t necessary. Also getting involved in the Bristol and District Anti-Cuts Alliance (www.bristolanticutsalliance.org.uk) which has open meetings on the first Monday of every month, this month at the Broadmead Baptist Church, Monday 7th March at 7pm. It was also mentioned that some people would be standing anti-cuts candidates in the local elections as part of the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition which some people said they would be happy to support.
Finally it was agreed to organise the meetings about once a month and to try and focus the next one on planning more local activity. (Details to follow once a venue has been sorted).

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

New issue of Socialism Today - Egypt's Revolution


The latest issue of The Socialist Party monthly magazine, Socialism Today is now out!
National Secretary, Peter Taaffe assesses the current situation in Egypt, prospects for the working class and poor peasants and their impact on the world.
"The Egyptian masses have shaken to the foundation the imperialist powers who believed they held all the reins in their hands. One placard held up in the post-Mubarak celebrations summed up the regional effects of the revolution: 'Two down, 20 to go'"- Taaffe.
In other articles, at a time when workers and youth prepare for the TUC called national demostration on March 26th in London, Lynn Walsh analyses the feeble conditions of British capitalism whilst Hannah Sell reviews the anti-cuts movement and what kind of strategy will be required to defeat the Con-Dem government.

Trade Unionists & Socialists Against Cuts - Election meeting TOMORROW

Thursday 3rd March 2011
Ye Shakespeare Pub, 78 Victoria Street, BRISTOL, BS1 6DR
7.30pm

Trade Unionists & Socialists Against Cuts (Bristol) will be standing anti-cuts candidates in the forthcoming local elections (5th May) against the mainstream parties- Conservatives, LibDems & Labour- all of whom support cuts and are making cuts. Come to our organising meeting next Thursday 3rd March to discuss potential candidates and which wards we should stand in, if you want to help in anyway, or even if you want to be a candidate yourself.


LibDem chief axe-woman, council leader Barbara Janke is the councillor for Clifton.
 It would be fantastic if we could find a student anti-cuts candidate to stand against her... any ideas?


The Labour seats up for re-election are: Bedminster, Brislington East – Lab marginal, Easton – Labour marginal, Filwood, Hartcliffe, Hillfields – Lib Dems took other seat in 2010, St. George East – Tory took other seat in 2009, Southville – Greens took other seat in 2010, Whitchurch Park – Lib Dems took other seat in 2010.


The LibDem seats up for re-election are: Ashley – Maj of 695 over Greens in 2009; Maj of 110 over Greens in 2007, Brislington West – Maj of 343 over Tories in 2007, Cabot, Clifton, Clifton East, Cotham, Eastville – Maj of 593 over Lab in 2009; Maj of 562 over Lab in 2007, Hengrove – Maj of 30 over Tories in 2007, Knowle – Maj of 710 over Labour in 2007, Lawrence Hill – Lib Marginal- Lab took other seat in 2009 by 9 votes, St. George West – Lib Marginal- Lab took other seat by 91 in 2009, Windmill Hill – Maj of 647 over Labour in 2007.


Tory seats up for re-election are: Bishopsworth, Frome Vale – Maj of 308 over Labour in 2009, and Stockwood.



Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=196631480361699


TUSC Election platform for May 2011: 
THE LOCAL council elections in May 2011 will be the first opportunity voters will have in England to register public opposition at the ballot box to the Con-Dem government's unparalleled attack on our public services. 
But the elections are not just a chance to make a one-day 'protest vote'. They are also an opportunity to elect councillors who can actually stop many of the cuts from being implemented locally. Over the years, it is true, local councils have been stripped of many of their powers over different services. Margaret Thatcher, who began this process, famously said, "I must take more power to the centre to stop socialism" - in other words, that public services that 'crowded out' the private sector should be curbed or, where they exist, should be opened up to private companies to make profits from public needs. It is a matter of record that the New Labour government carried on with this approach throughout its 13 years in office - the turnover of private companies running public services reached over £80 billion in 2008, for example, 126% higher than 1995-96 under the previous Tory government.

But councils still have enormous powers and responsibilities, controlling budgets totalling billions of pounds, spent on services from housing to schools, youth clubs, libraries, adult social care, crime reduction, sports centres, highways maintenance and refuse collection, to name but a few. They have legal powers, over some non-council provided services for example, including many of those now privatised, that they can exercise for our benefit.
What councillors do, therefore, can still affect the quality of our daily lives. They certainly don't have to accept every dictate from central government to cut or privatise our services. They have a choice. Even a minority group on a council, or a single councillor, can make a difference, by using their position as democratically elected local representatives to appeal to and help organise community campaigns and trade unionists to fight.
The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) is an alliance which includes individual trade unionists, community campaigners and different political parties. Yet, while we each have our own general policies and programme, all our candidates are committed to using every opportunity open to councillors - from public campaigning to presenting policy motions at council meetings - to do everything possible to protect and improve our public services. Voting for TUSC councillors will make a difference.

All TUSC councillors will:

* Oppose all cuts to council jobs, services, pay and conditions - we reject the claim that 'some cuts' are necessary to our services.
* Reject above inflation increases in council tax, rent and service charges to compensate for government cuts.
* Vote against the privatisation of council services, or the transfer of council services to 'social enterprises' or 'arms-length' management organisations, which are first steps to privatisation.
* Use all the legal powers available to councils, including powers to refer local NHS decisions, initiate referenda and organise public commissions and consultations, to oppose both the cuts and government polices which centrally impose the transfer of public services to private bodies.
* When faced with government cuts to council funding, councils should refuse to implement the cuts. We will support councils which in the first instance use their reserves and prudential borrowing powers to avoid passing them on - while arguing that the best way to mobilise the mass campaign that is necessary to defeat the cuts is to set a budget that meets the needs of the local community and demands that the government makes up the shortfall. http://www.tusc.org.uk/

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

Ireland - Election victory for the Socialist Party and United Left Alliance

Joe Higgins and Clare Daly (Socialist Party, CWI Ireland) elected to the Dail (Irish Parliament) along with up to 3 other candidates from the United Left Alliance. Further results to follow.


http://www.socialistparty.net/ - Socialist Party Ireland
http://www.unitedleftalliance.org/ - United Left Alliance

Gaddafi must go! It’s a fight to the finish

Masses reject foreign intervention as towns fall to opposition
Report by Niall Mulholland of the Committee For a Workers' International
http://www.socialistworld.net/doc/4884

Dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s control over Libya suffered big reversals over the weekend with the fall of Zawiyah, a city 30 miles from the capital, Tripoli, to opposition forces. Over 20 people are reported killed in fighting for control of the city, which started last Thursday and lasted four days. Zawiyah, an oil port and refinery, is now surrounded by Libyan army forces still loyal to Gaddafi but they have, so far, not attempted to retake the city.


The ten day uprising has left at least 1,000 dead and led to thousands fleeing the fighting. Tens of thousands of migrants are stranded near Libya’s Tunisian border.
Other towns across Libya have fallen to the opposition in recent days. Reports from Misrata town say opponents of Gaddafi repelled a regime counter-attack also over the weekend. Tripoli, partially still in the grip of the regime, is increasingly encircled. Tanks and checkpoints guard the main roads into the capital but the situation inside the city is becoming more chaotic and desperate, as crowds queue up outside shops to stock up on essential supplies and besiege banks to get their money.
In a push for a final armed assault on Gaddafi’s remaining support base, groups of heavily armed opposition forces are reportedly planning to march towards western Libya, to link up with opposition militias near Tripoli. The groups are mainly made up of young people and former members of the security forces who defected to the opposition during the fierce battles in Benghazi city which led to Gaddafi losing control of Libya’s second city. A member of the newly announced ‘interim government’ in Benghazi, Ramadan Faitoura, said the armed groups are not part of an ‘official’ drive on Tripoli, although they have the interim government’s support.
Gaddafi’s days in power appear to be shortening fast, although the regime’s demise can still be protracted and accompanied by more bloodshed. A potential major obstacle for an advancing opposition militia is the traditional Gaddafi family stronghold town of Sirte, which sits half way between Benghazi and Tripoli. Although some military and security personnel in Sirte defected to the opposition, it has not been in the same numbers as the east of the country. Gaddafi also has tribal support in Sirte. But this support base can fall away if the areas main tribe concludes that Gaddafi is a lost cause.
Indeed, every day, more tribes and former Gaddafi ministers, high ranking officials and diplomats denounce the regime and declare allegiance to the revolution. Army generals have stated their refusal to order shooting on protests and to launch fighter aircraft against unarmed civilians protesting in the streets.
Gaddafi’s recent speeches show a dictator who has lost control. He makes blood-curdling threats against demonstrators, mixed with anti-imperialist phrases mixed with attempts to foster divide and rule tactics – offering some tribes large amounts of money and land - which are failing. Despite his sometimes “revolutionary” rhetoric and the changes made since the 1969 coup, Gaddafi has ensured that control has remained in his own grip. Hence the luxurious lifestyle and wealth of his own children.
Sensing the way in which the struggle in Libya is likely to conclude, Western powers are now quickly publicly shedding their cosy links with the brutal Gaddafi regime. They are exploiting their past hostility to Gaddafi to present themselves as being on the side of the “people”, something they do not do in regard to the semi-feudal regimes of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. The imperialists are scrambling to influence a post-Gaddafi regime, to ensure continuing preferential and lucrative Western big business access to Libya’s oil fields and to safeguard imperialist interests in a vital geo-strategic region. The US, in particular, is terrified that the Libyan events could be emulated in oil-rich Saudi Arabia, where youth on the internet are calling 11 March the day of “revolution”.

Imperialism changes its tune
Western leaders have very belatedly discovered they have serious concerns about the lack of democracy in Libya and are now calling for the dictator to step down. The UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, announced that the new UN Security Council sanctions against the Gaddafi regime were imposed “to speed the transition to a new system of governance”. Even Gaddafi’s good friend, Italian Prime Minister, Berlusconi, instructed his foreign minister to de facto suspend its 2008 ‘friendship treaty’ with Libya, which includes a ‘non-aggression’ clause.
Amid reports that Gaddafi moved £3 billion to Britain, last week, the Cameron government froze the assets of the Libyan dictator and his family. British officials also reportedly contacted senior Libyan figures to try to persuade them to defect from the regime so that it collapses, rather than see a last ditch bloody fight to the end. Under the cloak of ‘humanitarian’ aid, some Western politicians are calling for a ‘no-fly zone’ over Libya and even Western military intervention into Libya and Saudi Arabia if mass revolts start there as well. The US has publicly backed anti-Gaddafi groups in eastern Libya.Amongst the Libyan masses, who are well aware of their history of opposition to colonialism, there is opposition to another imperialist intervention in the region. “Despite the heavy sacrifice they are offering every day, Libyans utterly reject any foreign intervention, even for their defence and protection,” writes Mahmoud Al-Nakou, a Libyan author (Guardian 28/02/11). “The people are adamant that this revolution is theirs alone.”Reports from Zawiyah show wide support for the uprising and also repudiate Gaddafi’s propaganda claims that the rebels are made up of drug-crazed youth and al-Qaida-inspired foreign fighters: “…they were the town’s people…the doctors and engineers, teachers, local youths and old men…”, reports the Guardian (London 28/02/11).Various ‘community committees’ and ‘councils of the elders’ have been set up in Benghazi, Musrata and Zawiyah to ‘restore order’ and opposition forces controlling eastern cities have formed a ‘national council’ in expectation of the fall of Tripoli.The former justice minister, Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, announced that he would head an interim government, suggesting that it has the backing of the US. He also said an agreement could be reached with the sons of Gaddafi, echoing some Western politicians.Although Mustafa Abdel-Jalil’s comments are disputed by other opposition figures, they still intend to include him in an interim government. This should act as a warning to the Libyan masses – their revolution is in danger of being hijacked by remnants of the Gaddafi regime, pro-bourgeois opposition ‘leaders’, reactionary tribal leaders and imperialist interests.

Committees vital
For the revolution to win its goals – for real democratic rights and a transformation in living standards – it needs democratically-elected committees that truly represent the interests of the mass of working people, youth and the poor, in the neighbourhoods, workplaces and colleges, linked up at local, regional and national levels. Building committees within the forces of the state is also vital. Putting forward democratic demands as well as those needed to assure decent living standards, such a movement can appeal to the masses of Tripoli to rise up against Gaddafi’s last stronghold.

The masses armed, under democratic control, can defend themselves against Gaddafi’s forces, march on his last bases of support, and sweep away the dictator and his entire regime while preventing the country once again falling under foreign control. 
Such a mass movement would immediately introduce full democratic rights and oversee elections to a revolutionary constituent assembly. A government representing the interests of workers and small farmers would take the oil fields into public ownership, and other major planks of the economy, under democratic workers’ control and management. This would ensure that the country’s huge natural riches serve the majority of society not only an elite around the corrupt Gaddafi family and giant multi-national companies.To ensure this, mass organisations of the working class need to be formed, including independent unions and a mass party of the working class, with bold socialist policies. Such mass class organisations would oppose not just Gaddafi and the remnants of his regime but all pro-capitalist and reactionary forces in Libya and meddling imperialism.